Senator Ireti Kingibe, representing the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) under the Labour Party, has voiced strong opposition to the use of a voice vote in the National Assembly’s approval of the emergency rule declaration. She argued that such a critical constitutional matter requires a recorded vote to ensure transparency and compliance with legal provisions.
In a statement, Senator Kingibe emphasized that “the Nigerian Constitution explicitly mandates that a state of emergency proclaimed by the President must be ratified by a two-thirds majority of all the members of each House of the National Assembly.” She insisted that a voice vote, which relies on lawmakers verbally expressing support or opposition, cannot accurately determine the required supermajority.
Citing Section 305(2) & (6)(b) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), she maintained that an emergency proclamation must receive formal approval from at least two-thirds of all members of both the Senate and the House of Representatives. She further argued that established legislative procedures mandate a recorded vote, whether through division voting, roll call, or electronic voting, for decisions of this magnitude.
“When a supermajority like two-thirds is needed, a recorded vote is not optional—it is a necessity,” Kingibe stated. “Without a roll call or electronic voting, the people haven’t spoken, and they cannot be made to bear responsibility for the President’s decision.”
She urged Nigerians to hold their representatives accountable and ensure that constitutional processes are upheld in legislative decisions, particularly on issues that affect governance at the national level.
Her stance highlights ongoing concerns regarding legislative transparency and adherence to constitutional procedures in Nigeria’s democratic process.
